We build and run AI agents inside your business, every one of them reviewed, logged, and owned by a named human. So when a client, an auditor, or your own board asks who decided what, and on what basis, the answer is already written down.
We build your Claude setup: connected, loaded with your knowledge, and used.
Write the rules
Security and AI policies, signed, and a platform to keep them current.
Automate or build
Agents for a workflow. Custom software when it needs to be software.
Then embed
A named engineer inside your business. That's where this goes.
The gap
Everybody has tried AI. Almost nobody has it doing real work.
Your team already uses AI. They opened a chat window, pasted something in, and got something useful back. That part is finished: the awareness gap closed a year ago.
What almost no business has is an agent doing a job. Something that reads the inbox every morning, drafts the response, files it in the right system, and knows when to stop and ask a person. 74% of leaders say AI has improved productivity, yet no single function has moved past pilot for more than about a quarter of them.
The distance between those two numbers is not enthusiasm. It is the last mile: connecting to the systems you actually run, working with data that is actually messy, and having someone accountable when it gets something wrong at 2am.
"Couldn't we just have AI do it?"
You could, and that is the trap. An agent that nobody reviews, nobody logs, and nobody signs for is a liability dressed up as a solution. The moment a client, an insurer, an auditor, or opposing counsel asks"who decided this, and on what basis?", the gap becomes the story.
Nobody signs their name to a chatbot's output. We sign ours.
49%of business leaders name data security and compliance as their top barrier to adopting AI
27%the highest share scaling any single AI use case past pilot: data analytics. Every other function is lower
Adoption figures: Upwork, The State of AI Within SMBs, 2026. Regulatory references: Colorado ADMT Act (SB 26-189), NYC Local Law 144, EU AI Act.
Offerings
Six things. That's the whole list.
Every one stands alone and is priced alone. Nothing obligates the next thing. They connect because each engagement makes the next one cheaper (your context pack carries forward), not because we bundle them.
01 · Build the environment
Claude Setup
We come in and build your Claude setup: connected to your real systems, loaded with your real knowledge, and actually used by your team.
$2,900 – $12,900Four modules · take what you need
Start here if: your team has access to AI and it hasn't changed how anyone works. Most clients start here.
Rather than hand you a rate card, answer these and we will show you the few things that actually apply to your business, and what they cost.
Fit Finder
Nothing is sent anywhere. This runs entirely in your browser.
Where are you with AI today?
Be honest. Most businesses are further back than they think.
What do you want to happen next?
Pick up to two.
Is anyone asking how you govern AI or security?
Clients, insurers, auditors, a board, a big customer's procurement team.
Once it's running, who owns it?
The honest answer here decides whether this lasts past month three.
Here's what applies to you.
Fixed fees. Model and licence costs pass through at cost; we don't mark up tokens. Every engagement carries a written exclusions list and change control.
One free conversation. Bring whichever hurts more.
AI Readiness Check · 30 minutes · no obligation
A process that eats your week, or your last insurance application.
Bring a process and we tell you honestly whether an agent can do it, what it would take and what it would cost, or that it cannot, and why. Bring the application and we show you where its AI and security answers do not match how you actually operate. You keep the findings either way.
The method is the same everywhere. The evidence, the vocabulary, and the first thirty minutes are built separately for the three industries we know best.
Legal · 15–75 attorneys
The malpractice renewal now asks about AI.
The renewal checklist, the readiness assessment, and the Renewal Dry Run: thirty minutes on your last liability application. You keep the findings.
Financial and wealth management · SEC-registered, $250M–$5B AUM
You have the AI policy. Three parties ask for the file.
The pre-exam checklist, the evidence assessment, and the Evidence File: thirty minutes on the artifacts an examiner, a carrier and an acquirer each want.
Every carrier, examiner and enterprise customer has started asking the same question: what is your policy on AI? Most firms do not have one. This builds you a first draft in about ten minutes, specific to the tools you actually use, not a template with your name pasted on top.
AI Use Policy Starter · ten minutes · no cost
A real first draft, not a blank template.
Answer four short sets of questions about the tools your people use, the data you handle, and the uses you want off the table. You get a draft you can circulate the same day, plus an honest read on where a generic policy stops being enough for your obligations.
The first engagement is usually Claude Setup, your tenant secured and connected to your systems in about a week, for $2,900, or an Agent Blueprint, the spec and a fixed quote for one agent in two weeks, for $4,900. Each ends with a real deliverable, and neither obligates the next thing.